<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Motion-Picture on caffenol.org</title><link>https://www.caffenol.org/category/motion-picture/</link><description>Recent content in Motion-Picture on caffenol.org</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.caffenol.org/category/motion-picture/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Coffee in motion</title><link>https://www.caffenol.org/2012/07/23/coffee-in-motion/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.caffenol.org/2012/07/23/coffee-in-motion/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Developing 35mm film in caffenol works. No doubt. There are &lt;a href="https://www.caffenol.org/2011/03/06/rollei-rpx-400-wasretro-400s"&gt;very little films&lt;/a&gt; that do not develop in caffenol. If you stay away from these and mostly scan your pictures, you will be fine. With any caffenol-recipe that you can find on the internet you will in the end see a picture on the negative. It might be foggy, dense, underdeveloped, but seeing something that works and something that you made yourself is always amazing. Film is not dead!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>