<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Olympus-Om4ti on caffenol.org</title><link>https://www.caffenol.org/tag/olympus-om4ti/</link><description>Recent content in Olympus-Om4ti on caffenol.org</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.caffenol.org/tag/olympus-om4ti/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Scan VS print</title><link>https://www.caffenol.org/2010/11/07/scan-vs-print/</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.caffenol.org/2010/11/07/scan-vs-print/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, the title of this post looks confusing, because of course scanning is an input process and printing is an output process. Ad it’s even more confusing, as the print needs to be scanned as well… But first things first.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My last development of ISO 3200 Film was quite successful and I was quite surprised by the results. The negatives didn’t look as good as HP5 or TMAX but I thought those could be actually ‘thick’ enough to be enlarged onto paper.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ISO 50</title><link>https://www.caffenol.org/2010/09/03/iso-50/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.caffenol.org/2010/09/03/iso-50/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I started analogue photography, I wanted to shoot on grainy high speed films primarily, preferable at night. So far I have not managed to do a grainy night shooting, but did buy a lot of different films just to see, how they look in caffenol. So this week I tried Ilford Pan F 50, a panchromatic ISO 50 film. And as I currently have an Olympus OM4-Ti, it was just perfect to try out the spot metering features of it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>